The fight against misinformation needs a hero like you.
Add your views to this topic by signing up. You’ll also be able to add or vote on sources, and start new topics. Because if you don’t fight misinformation, who will?
The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has set restrictions that ensure that the peak in signal power for any one localised area will remain far lower than what is required to adversely affect human health.
WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (including 5g) as "possibly carcinogenic to humans", based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.
The Advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, representing 248 scientists from 42 nations, have submitted appeals to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), requesting the UNEP reassess the potential biological impacts of 4G and 5G telecomms technologies.
Add your views to this topic by signing up. You’ll also be able to add or vote on sources, and start new topics. Because if you don’t fight misinformation, who will?
There are specific risks relating to heating damage to eyes, because of the limited cooling ability of the lens. But this will probably only occur in people subjected to whole body or localised heating, sufficient to increase tissue temperatures by more than 1 degree centigrade.
Although society is reassured that potential thermal risks from 5g have been mitigated, there are widespread reports of 5g phones and modems overheating in the summer. This could raise concerns about whether phone manufacturers truly have these thermal effects under control.
In one study, transgenic mice exposed to a digital phone signal developed more than twice as many non-lymphoblastic lymphomas as the unexposed control group—a statistically significant increase. These results suggest a potential carcinogenic effect from the digital phone signal.
Add your views to this topic by signing up. You’ll also be able to add or vote on sources, and start new topics. Because if you don’t fight misinformation, who will?
Viruses cannot travel on radio waves/mobile networks. COVID-19 is spreading in many countries that do not have 5G mobile networks. COVID-19 is spread through respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs, sneezes or speaks.
The existing cell phone certification process uses a plastic model of the head based on the top 10% of US military recruits in 1989, but the rates of radiation absorption by some typical phone users, like children, has been found to be 153% higher than seen in the plastic model.
This is because radiation and viruses exist in different forms that do not interact at the scale required for viral transmission. One is a biological phenomenon (coronavirus) and the other exists on the electromagnetic spectrum (5g).
Add your views to this topic by signing up. You’ll also be able to add or vote on sources, and start new topics. Because if you don’t fight misinformation, who will?
The analysis of these higher frequencies found that 80% of studies showed responses to exposure in living organisms. It also concluded, "The available studies do not provide adequate and sufficient information for a meaningful safety assessment."
There could be interactive effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of radiofrequency radiation (RFR), meaning increased overall risk of harm. There is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.